Misconduct, not error, accounts for most scientific paper retractions: 10-fold increase in fraud-related retractions found
Monday, October 1, 2012 - 15:30
in Psychology & Sociology
In sharp contrast to previous studies suggesting that errors account for the majority of retracted scientific papers, a new analysis -- the most comprehensive of its kind -- has found that misconduct is responsible for two-thirds of all retractions. In the paper, misconduct included fraud or suspected fraud, duplicate publication and plagiarism. The paper's findings show as a percentage of all scientific articles published, retractions for fraud or suspected fraud have increased 10-fold since 1975.